Threat modeling & architecture review
Structured analysis of systems before they ship — scaled from a single feature to a whole platform, and kept alive in the repository, not a slide deck.
Independent application security & architecture practice
Build Secure Partners helps product and platform teams build systems that are secure by construction — through threat modeling, secure code review, supply chain hardening, and regulation translated into engineering work your teams can ship.
01Practice
Most security debt is an architecture decision made without the right question on the table. We bring the question early, while changing the answer is still cheap.
Structured analysis of systems before they ship — scaled from a single feature to a whole platform, and kept alive in the repository, not a slide deck.
Secure code review, API security and verification against OWASP ASVS — findings ranked by exploitability and fixed as patterns, not one-offs.
Requirements, review practices and pipeline guardrails that fit how your teams already deliver — so the secure path is also the fastest one.
Know what you ship and where it came from — dependency risk, SBOMs, signed builds and provenance, wired into the pipeline rather than audited after.
NIS2, DORA and the Cyber Resilience Act translated into backlog items with owners and acceptance criteria — evidence produced by delivery, not by binders.
Senior architecture capacity embedded in your teams for a defined period — with a clear handover, so capability stays when we leave.
02Method
Step 01 · Model
Data flows, trust boundaries and the assumptions everything rests on — captured as one shared threat model that engineering owns and keeps current.
Step 02 · Decide
Every material risk becomes an architecture decision with explicit trade-offs, recorded so teams can challenge it, reuse it, and revisit it when the context changes.
Step 03 · Embed
Decisions become reference patterns, pipeline guardrails and sensible defaults. Teams move faster because the hard questions already have good answers.
Step 04 · Prove
Each requirement traces to a control and each control to a test. When the auditor or regulator asks, the answer already exists — generated by the way you work.
03Design review
Five findings from a typical first pass over a commerce platform — and the architectural changes that close them. Switch views, or hover any marker.
Found — the operator console is reachable straight from the internet, protected by a password alone.
Changed — moved behind identity-aware access; sessions are short-lived and bound to managed devices.
Found — every service reaches the primary store with the same high-privilege account.
Changed — per-service identities with least-privilege grants, issued at runtime and never stored.
Found — payment callbacks are accepted without verifying who sent them.
Changed — signatures verified, replays rejected, amounts reconciled before any state changes.
Found — the customer session token travels unchanged into internal services, widening its reach.
Changed — the gateway exchanges it for short-lived tokens scoped to one downstream audience.
Found — bulk reads of customer data leave no trace anyone could review later.
Changed — an append-only audit log captures sensitive operations, with alerts on unusual volume.
04Outcomes
0wk
Typical first engagement, from kickoff to a reviewed architecture and a prioritised backlog.
0
Shared threat model per product, versioned alongside the code it describes.
0
Regulatory frameworks mapped onto a single, de-duplicated control set.
0%
Of controls traceable to a requirement and to the test that proves it.
The cheapest vulnerability is the one that never makes it past the whiteboard.
06Contact
Tell us what you are building and where it feels uncertain. You will hear back from a practitioner within one working day — not a sales team.